Westminster’s top dog Colin Barrow leads Tory Cllrs who want a ‘Magna Carta for localism’ but is this good for the people or good for them?
Posted: 12th January 2010 | 4 Comments »
News is breaking today that top Tory Cllrs are making their final push to get a ’Magna Carta for localism‘ embedded in the Conservatives pre-election manifesto.
This could be very good news for UK riders in my view but not in a way that Cllr Barrow would like it. It is only fair to assume that many conservative councillors and MPs are in favour of a ‘localist’ emphasis – on the basis that it will help ensure that policy decisions are made in the best interests of people where they have greatest impact – namely at local level. But, and I have to say it’s a very big but in my view, there is often a very big gap between the real motives that politicians have for increasing political power at local level, and the seemingly well meant theories that can reassure us that everything they plan will be as lovely as it can be.
The last time I spoke to Barrow was before an exceptionally well attended full council meeting in which the ‘experimental’ motorbike parking charges/tax scheme was to be reviewed. He told me that his officers (led no doubt by Alastair Gilchrist ‘this is not a revenue raising exercise’ ) said that Westminster had ‘problems’ with meeting demand for bike parking in the borough. I told him that there was a simple solution to all these ‘problems’ and that is to look at what all comparable cities do. Throughout the EU and most of the developed world, local authorities recognise the invaluable positive role that scooters and motorcycles play in modern towns and cities – and do not see riders as a potential target for new taxes. Very sensibly and rightly, most transport authorities outside the UK allow riders to park without extra charges in the abundance of places they can use without causing inconvenience to anyone or cost to the council. Barrow looked nonplussed at my suggestion and could find nothing to say apart from “Oh, I see” Not quite true of course because it was clear to me that neither he nor his officers had bothered looking for ‘solutions’ that didn’t involve creating a new tax.
Now though, in addition to various other challenges ahead for Barrow he may have a new and real problem. His fellow top Tory Councillors and key parliamentarians may start taking a very dim view of his council’s plans to pioneer a brand new local tax – to ‘solve’ a bike parking ‘problem’ that doesn’t exist in any other world city. The real problem for Barrow and us all is that Westminster council has always led the way in screwing all the money they can, from any group of road users they can, in the form of parking ‘management’ and highly profitable privatised enforcement. But if the new Tory Magna Carter ends up being seen as a charter for councillors to impose more localised taxes, and especially on vulnerable road users in the form of PTW riders, it may not seem quite as attractive to the electorate as it’s promoters hope. This latest development of a new ‘Magna Carter’ and controversial measures for enforcement also begs other questions. Not least important of these concerns the way Cllr Barrow will be seen by his fellow politicians and the great British public. Will he be hailed as a ‘people power’ Baron or slide into disfavour as a greedy King John?
Barrow and his followers seem to want tax and control everyone working or living in what he sees as his kingdom.
We have just witnessed Tory Councillor Angela Harvey try to be the first to tax cyclists using Westminster’s own private enforcement army. Yes she coated the tax with typical spin saying that she was concerned about the enormous number of ‘little old ladies’ being mown down each day in the kingdom. Yet through a well placed Freedom of information request it was clear there were no actual facts to back up her tax as there were none to back up the M/C parking tax..
Then there is Barrow himself, who last year tried to rush through a bill in Parliament to ban all protests in Parliament Square and surrounding areas (no doubt including City Hall), unless they first obtain permission from the kingdom, and guarantee that protests will peaceful and ‘nice’. Will he also expect protestors to pay an administration tax to the council as well?
So to the present day, we see the kingdom being the first to tax PTW riders despite the kingdom of Barrow facing the largest opposition in its history. Respected residents’ associations were ignored, law abiding citizens have been smeared in the media, 50 year old motorcycling associations miss-quoted and brushed aside along with common sense.
Yes all the signs are there already if you want to know what the next four years will be like under king Barrow’s dictatorship. More CCTV, more men in bright new uniforms collecting taxes and restricting freedom throughout his rotten borough.
Conservative party policy is to devolve power to the local councils, god help us all.
Hmm, interesting comments Blue, sounds like you’re not convinced that Cllr/wannabe king Barrow is an entirely good egg!?
I’m not sure that many people would consider a man who is a multi millionaire hedge fund manager, who trousers over £47,000 of taxpayers expenses yet can’t seem to stretch to paying for his own car parking is entirely a ‘good egg’.
Not sure enough voters have their eyes open in Westminster.
I must agree with blue here… barrow is the worst person (besides chalkley) to stay in power.. He is the personification of all the voting public has come to hate and if he gets back in.. serious questions should be asked to his supporters…